Microchip ID- Doggy Technology

There looks like some countries disregarding human dignity, downgrading human to be dogs. That plan is to implant microchip in the human body just like for dog.
As this technology is too old fashioned, anyone can transfer such capsule to god or cat or motorcycle or what so ever moving entity. Let Government keep track some capsule. Someone may give you copied one or better one, like all copies of Mr. President. This happens because there is no biometrical relationship between capsules to human.

Easily replaceable, easily copy-able, easily shield-able, legacy, low level, Dark Age technology for DOGs.

Implantation to DOGs.

Our future, implanting to our body, if not using I AM card.

Farther more, the wireless frequency microchip for pet is 125 kHz ( ISO 11784/117785) and 134.2 kHz (11784/85, 134.2 kHz )and the photo looks very similar to capsule for pet, coil winding around ferrite core, cannot be even closer to the range of 1 GHz, how this can communicate with Satellite???? Toll gate at highway is 2-5 GHz with around 100 feet at back scattering. In much higher frequency range, Body acts as conductive body and thus very difficult have long range of communications. We cannot see any battery in the capsule, so communication distance is further limited.

Another way to make capsle undetectable is to make LC circuit tuned to the carrier frequency ant put neaby the embedded capsle.

Actually the video shows the distance is few inches, nevertheless talking about GPS(???): Introduced as BARD CODE people (not hair bar code) , http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1969277708432444041&ei=wAnfSajHC4jIwgO_prS6Dw&q=microchip&hl=ja. For searching DOG, GPS is attached to the body not in the capsule as shown in the Photo. Do you want to be like this?

Our future, if not using I AM card.

People can shield wireless communication by putting coin or aluminum foil on that and can put on faked on the top. If any those who want use this, recommended to eat dog food. There are some concern reported that implanted MicroChip caused CANCER. (http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/microchip-implants-may-cause-cancer.html). What is interesting even a owner of this company is not ready to implant it.

e-Smart card, contracting to Legacy doggy technology, human possess and card holder’s irreversibly encrypted fingerprint is stored in the card, which can be only used by the card holder under ISO 14443A/B, of course no battery wireless power and fingerprint matching system on card. This is the technology for human and not for dogs. Korea start using this now.

No injection needed.

US Patent: Secure Biometric Verification of Identification

IDENTITY THEFT AND FRAUD:

Dear Mr.Obama and Mr.MacCane,

We wonder who is responsbile for eliminating Fraud, especially on Social Security Fraud. There are so many proposal to eliminate Fraud by leading technology of biometrics. For example, e-Smart, since 2001, has been proposing fingerprint match on card based on the request from Social Security Office so that fingerprint information never leaves the card for protecting privacy of card holders. e-Smart has successfly developed that and Korea is start usinng that.

IDENTITY THEFT AND FRAUD:

Identity theft has been one of the major problems in this world. Within US itself there have been many cases of fraud caused by identity theft. Following are a few examples of identity theft fraud that have been listed in the http://www.usdoj.gov website:

Example1: Central District of California. A woman pleaded guilty to federal charges of using a stolen Social Security number to obtain thousands of dollars in credit and then filing for bankruptcy in the name of her victim. More recently, a man was indicted, pleaded guilty to federal charges and was sentenced to 27 months' imprisonment for obtaining private bank account information about an insurance company's policyholders and using that information to deposit $764,000 in counterfeit checks into a bank account he established.

Example 2: Central District of California. Two of three defendants have pleaded guilty to identity theft, bank fraud, and related charges for their roles in a scheme to open bank accounts with both real and fake identification documents, deposit U.S. Treasury checks that were stolen from the mail, and withdraw funds from those accounts.

Example 3: Middle District of Florida. A defendant has been indicted on bank fraud charges for obtaining names, addresses, and Social Security numbers from a Web site and using those data to apply for a series of car loans over the Internet.

Example 4: Southern District of Florida. A woman was indicted and pleaded guilty to federal charges involving her obtaining a fraudulent driver's license in the name of the victim, using the license to withdraw more than $13,000 from the victim's bank account, and obtaining five department store credit cards in the victim's name and charging approximately $4,000 on those cards.

Example 5: District of Kansas. A defendant pleaded guilty to conspiracy, odometer fraud, and mail fraud for operating an odometer "rollback" scheme on used cars. The defendant used false and assumed identities, including the identities of deceased persons, to obtain false identification documents and fraudulent car titles.

Above were just few examples to show how devastating identity theft can be for a victim. Incidences like there are becoming very common and proper measures needs to be taken by the US government and also governments around the world to counteract identity theft fraud.

PROPOSED MEASURES TO BE TAKEN TO COUNTER IDENTITY THEFT:
1. Social Security Number is not a reliable identifier:
Dr. Ron Paul, a Republican member of Congress from Texas, proposed to the congress about implementing an Identity Theft Prevention Act. This act is discourages the use of social security number as national identifier because once the number is stolen, along with a fake ID, it would be easy for any person to impersonate the person whose social security number has been compromised. In the above examples there is a case in which one person opened many fake accounts in a bank using fake ID and then pooled all the money from fake accounts to his real account. These incidences indicate a serious flaw in the way a person is identified. Just based on given social security number and looking at an ID is not enough to establish that the person is who he claims to be. There is always a possibility that the social security number could have been stolen and a fake ID could have been made. In other words looks can be deceptive.
Related Link:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul228.html

2. Rely on Digital Technology than on humans:
Paper forms of identifying a person rely heavily on the skills and ability of a human to identify potential fraud and risk. Training personnel can help with fraud caused by paper records, but there is still an accepted level of human error that is permitted. By placing less reliance on humans to perform an ID check and more reliance on digital technology, the human error factor is reduced and higher efficiency rates can be achieved. Moving from a dependency of paper to a streamlined digital system is one way identity fraud risk patterns can be identified and mitigated.
Related Link:
http://ezinearticles.com/?Mitigating-Identity-Fraud-With-Fingerprint-Biometrics&id=1171062

3. Utilize Fingerprint Biometrics to eliminate possibility of multiple fake ID’s.
Fingerprint biometrics are a leading digital technology that can be utilized in digital identity authentication. Those in a point of service setting that use fingerprint biometrics do so by scanning a customer's ID through a system and instructing the customer to use a keypad to match fingerprints with a stored fingerprint identity. Fingerprint biometrics help increase the chances that the person in front of you presenting an ID is that ID's true identity. The result is an ability to capture and link fingerprints to a single ID record, which will increase fraud prevention and help ensure fraudsters do not attempt to use multiple identities.
Related Link:
http://ezinearticles.com/?Mitigating-Identity-Fraud-With-Fingerprint-Biometrics&id=1171062

4. Biometric Verification to link multiple IDs to single person:
Those in a point of service setting pay for fraud twice, once stemming from the initial act of fraud and a second time as a result of cost of goods, services and even insurance rates increases. Biometric verification can help resolve the problem of ID fraud and provide the point of service person that the customer presented is the actual person represented on the ID. The benefit of a biometric verification is that legitimate multiple IDs can be linked to a single person through one unique biometric fingerprint records. The additional benefit is that this unique biometric fingerprint cannot be utilized in multiple fraudulent IDs.
Related Link:
http://ezinearticles.com/?Mitigating-Identity-Fraud-With-Fingerprint-Biometrics&id=1171062

SOME EXAMPLES ON HOW BIOMETRIC TECHNOLOGY CAN BE USED TO PREVENT IDENTITY THEFT.

Example 1: Biometric smart card for Social Security proposed:
Current Social Security cards have limited security features and have no photo or biometric data and thus can be easily faked. In an effort to help combat identity theft and fraud, U.S. Rep. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) is proposing a new Social Security card that would be based on the same technology the U.S. Department of Defense uses for the Common Access Card. The proposed cards would feature a photograph and fingerprint, as well as a computer chip, bar code and magnetic strip.
Related links:
http://www.secureidnews.com/2008/02/14/biometric-smart-card-for-social-security-proposed
http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2008/feb/12/news/chi-securitycard_12feb12

Example 2: New technology to protect pension funds from social security fraud:
Pension funds all over the world are confronted with the problem of misrepresentation for claiming pensions, which has resulted in huge loss to their legitimate beneficiaries. A Philippine-based pension fund has brought to the U.S. a technology mix that could put an end to fraud that often takes place in the delivery of social security benefits across nations. The Government Service Insurance System (GSIS) of Philippines unveiled on March 6, 2007 at the Philippine Center Building in San Francisco the GSIS Wireless Automated Processing System (GW@PS) to serve its pensioners and members in the area. The GW@PS is a home-blend of some of the most modern technologies—such as biometrics, smart card, and virtual private network—all working together to efficiently deliver social benefits while increasing safeguards against common claims fraud.
Related Link:
http://www.gsis.gov.ph/content.asp?ContentId=651&headertype1=left

Example 2: Trust in smartcards to prevent Internet and credit card fraud:
Internet fraud may perhaps one of the safest and economical ways of doing fraud, because for the person doing fraud there is no need to present any fake ID or give out social security number for online purchases. Perhaps that is why credit card fraud is 8 to 9 times more common in online channels than it is in traditional channels. If somehow a criminal minded person comes to know the credit card details and name of some other person then the criminal minded person can purchase products online using the credit card information of the other person. If a person losses his credit card or purse then at least he will take measures to cancel the card the moment he realizes it is missing, but if he has the card and just his information on the card is stolen then he will not realize his information has been compromised until he checks his credit card statement. If the person who is the victim of fraud does not check his credit card account periodically then he may not be aware of the fraud for a long time, resulting in huge loss for him.
One way to prevent internet fraud is by using biometric smartcards. Outfitted with a small microprocessor, smart cards perform all the functions of a traditional credit card, but provide greatly improved security as well as a range of specialized applications that take advantage of the card's ability to store and process personalized data. Smartcards are safer than credit cards because one can't just type a card number and expiration date into an online form or present the card to a sales agent at store or use it in a gas station. One must physically pass the smart card through a specialized card reader that communicates with the smartcard's built-in processor and data storage. Users can securely store personal data in the smartcards, which they can then share selectively to reduce the time they spend filling out tedious forms. Merchants can benefit because they can use the smart cards to offer electronic coupons or other special promotions aimed at improving sales and customer loyalty. Smart cards are also an excellent fit for multichannel sales because they are truly portable and can be used in a variety of settings--from physical stores to PCs to mobile phones--as long as those settings are equipped with card readers. People in European countries have been doing online and physical monetary transactions using smartcards for many years, but in the United States the technology is still new because the major credit-card companies didn't embrace the technology when it was first introduced--probably because it would have meant replacing billions of dollars' worth of existing technology. But now that the liability for credit-card fraud has shifted from merchants to card issuers there is considerable need for smartcards in United States to prevent fraud. Most analysts forecast fairly broad adoption of smart cards in the United States in the next two to three years.
Related Link:
http://www.zdnet.com.au/tag/news/fraud-security-smartcard.htm

Analysis on ID-Smart Card

Analysis on ID-Smart card photo in web www.id-smart to original id-smart card made in 2006,
Using e-smart circuit and e-smart components.
The card image matches.

e-Smart Technologies, Inc. Responds to Information Subpoenas From Securities & Exchange...

Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:00pm EST

Email Print Share Reprints Single Page[-] Text [+]

e-Smart Technologies, Inc. Responds to Information Subpoenas From Securities & Exchange Commission

NEW YORK, Dec. 31 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- via COMTEX -- As discussed by e-Smart Technologies, Inc. (Pink Sheets: ESMT); ("e-Smart" or the Company") during its December 27, 2007 Telephonic Shareholder Conference Call, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has initiated an inquiry and has issued subpoenas to the Company for documents including those relating to certain loans made to e-Smart from its parent company IVI Smart Technologies Inc., ("IVI") and Intermarket Ventures, Inc. As in all such inquiries, the SEC has confirmed that it is conducting a "non-public fact-finding inquiry" and that its inquiry "does not mean that [the SEC] have a negative opinion of any person, entity or security" or "that anyone has broken the law."

As confirmed by the Company's legal counsel during that telephonic conference, "we received those requests for information, we've reviewed them and we're in the process of complying with all requests for information that come from the SEC."

The Company's legal counsel, Maranda Fritz, also provided an update relating to other important legal issues affecting the Company including the Company's pending litigation in the Northern District of California which resulted from the actions taken by two convicted felons, Wayne Drizin and Michael Gardiner, and Gardiner's company, ID Smart. Fritz advised that the
court issued an order prohibiting Drizin from any involvement in the biometric smart card industry, and barring Gardiner from using any e-Smart technology.

The court further ordered that those defendants return to e-Smart any and all property of the Company that they possessed. The Company is seeking a permanent injunction to prevent any use in the future of e-Smart's technology by Drizin and Gardiner and ID Smart.

The issuance of subpoenas by the SEC may also relate to further efforts by Gardiner and the other defendants to damage the Company and its shareholders. In November of 2007, Gardiner issued a public release stating that he had written a letter to the SEC claiming that the Company should have but did not publicly report their own -- Gardiner's and Drizin's -- wrongful conduct and their attempted theft of the Company's property. Details of these actions by Drizin and Gardiner were made public by the Company in a November 14, 2007 press release "e-Smart Technologies Responds to Press Release Issued by IDsmart LLC," and is available on the Company's website http://www.e-smart.com/.

In response to the SEC's inquiry, Mary Grace, CEO of e-Smart said, "The SEC is dedicated to the protection of the shareholders of public companies, and as the protection of our shareholders is my utmost concern, I am grateful that the SEC is looking into these issues. The actions of Gardiner and Drizin did cause damage to our shareholders because the Company was forced to take legal action to protect its intellectual property, and experienced delays in production. That Gardiner then tried to use his own fraudulent conduct to support his claims to the SEC, we believe, makes a mockery of the SEC and constitutes another act of securities fraud, the same conduct for which he already stands convicted. The Company will make available all information
requested by the SEC so they can fully review the actions of Wayne Drizin and Michael Gardiner/ID Smart against our shareholders and our Company. I am confident that, after the SEC looks at all matters relating to our Company, they will take appropriate steps to address the repeated instances of wrongful conduct by Drizin and Gardiner, and protect our Company and others from such conduct in the future."

e-Smart Technologies, Inc., is the exclusive supplier of the Biometric Verification Security(TM) (BVS2(TM)) system, the Super Smart Card(TM) system technology and related system technologies for Asia, Africa and the US, which e-Smart believes to be the world's first smartcard of its kind with an on-card sensor and a full match on-card system and other unique technologies for secure biometric ID verification. e-Smart's next generation technologies allow governments, public and private institutions, healthcare providers and insurers, companies large and small, to provide a superior level of protection. The Super Smart Card(TM) system technology and BVS2(TM) security system can secure countries from criminal and terrorist threats, stop ID and
payment fraud, along with identity theft in connection with physical and logical access and financial transactions, including telephone, Internet payment and other financial and data related transactions all while protecting individual privacy.

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT
Statements in this news release that relate to future plans, financial results or projections, events or performance are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. While these statements are made to convey to the public the Company's progress,
business opportunities and growth prospects, readers are cautioned that such forward-looking statements represent the management's opinion. While management believes such representations to be true and accurate based on information available to the Company at this time, actual results may differ materially from those described.

For more information about e-Smart Technologies, please visit http://www.e-smart.com or contact Media Relations at 703-768-7477 or mailto:ormediarelations@e-smart.com SOURCE e-Smart Technologies, Inc.

Media Relations of e-Smart Technologies, Inc., +1-703-768-7477, mediarelations@e-smart.com

http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS104201+31-Dec-2007+PRN20071231

IDsmart Admits in Court Document That e-Smart's Technology was Used to Develop IDsmart's Smart Card

NEW YORK, April 9 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- e-Smart(R) Technologies, Inc. (Pink Sheets: ESMT); ("e-Smart" or the "Company") and its parent company, IVI Smart Technologies, Inc., (IVI) (hereinafter, collectively, the "Company") learned from disclosures filed in a Motion last month by IDsmart LLC, in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, Case No. 3:06cv5528MHP, that IDsmart admitted that its engineers were directed to use e-Smart's technology in developing IDsmart's biometric smart card product, as the original complaint filed by the Company against IDsmart for theft and misappropriation of our biometric smart card technology alleges. IDsmart also confirmed that, because its engineers had been instructed to use e-Smart's technology, IDsmart did not actually have a product design and was unable to "release" any product until approximately four months ago.
Mary Grace, President and CEO of e-Smart(R) said, "Finally, IDsmart admitted what we alleged in the original lawsuit and which we have argued before the Court for nearly two years -- which IDsmart repeatedly denied until now. IDsmart now admits not only that their engineers used e-Smart's technology but also that they have known for more than a year that e-Smart's technology was used in developing IDsmart's claimed biometric smart card product. Rather than acknowledging that they had used e-Smart's technology, IDsmart continued trying to sell an IDsmart product and failed to acknowledge to the Court that e-Smart's claims were true. In the original lawsuit filed against IDsmart the Company alleged the theft and misappropriation of e-Smart's technology by IDsmart, which claim IDsmart repeatedly denied under oath to the court. The Company also reported the theft of the technology to both the police and FBI in 2006, which IDsmart, Michael Gardiner and Wayne Drizin, both convicted felons, denied at that time. The Company will now file new reports to both th
** Please, go to:
http://leninology.blogspot.com/2008/09/long-con.html
http://www.thesanitycheck.com/Default.aspx?EntryID=215&tabid=84

SOURCE e-Smart Technologies, Inc.
Copyright©2008 PR Newswire.
All rights reserved

http://www.bio-medicine.org/biology-news-1/IDsmart-Admits-in-Court-Document-That-e-Smarts-Technology-was-Used-to-Develop-IDsmarts-Smart-Card-2839-1/

Global Biometric Standard

Global Biometric Comittee Standard:

Unlike virtual Standard of other Biometrics Standars, Global Biometrics Comittee Standard focus on relaistic standard.
All standard related to integratable fingerprint sensor and on-chip matching algorithm. We do not define any legacy optical sensor fingerprint matching system.


1: algorithm on Chip
CBC 1001 Minutiae
CBC 1002 Complex Plane
CBC 1003 Htybrids


2: sensor
CBC 2001 Resolutionand gray scale evaluation method and definition
CBC 2002 Fingerprint Area Sensor Standard
CBC 2003 Wet finger evaluation method and definition
CBC 2004 Dry finger evaluation method and definition
CBC 2005 ESD fingerprint evaluation method and definition
CBC 2006 Finger touch duration evaluation method and definition.
CBC 2007 Back light duration evaluation method and definition.
CBC 2008 Fake finger duration evaluation method and definitions.

3: Card
CBC 3001 Matching System on Card definition
CBC 3002 Matching System on Card contaxt type definition
CBC 3003 Matching System on Card wireless type definition
CBC 3004 Matching System on Card Combi typr definitions.
CBC 3005 Matching System on Card OPT typr definitions.

5: System
CBC 5001 System FAR and FRR definition

6. BioAPI

Jean-Franqois Mainguet

Jean-François Mainguet was born in Sarrebourg, France, on July 3, 1960. He became an engineer for Télécommunications de Bretagne in 1984. Since joining Thomson-CSF Semiconducteurs Spécifiques, Grenoble in 1984, he has been engaged in the development of SOS and SOI rad-hard semiconductor devices, electrical simulation, layout & mask design tools, analog to digital converter design and invented the sweeping technique for direct silicon fingerprint scanning. He was chief scientist of the FingerChip® project since Thomson became Atmel in 2000.
In 2009, he joined the CEA-Leti, Grenoble.

Email: jean-francois.mainguet@wanadoo.fr

Published papers:

1. J.F. Mainguet, W.Marais "Un capteur thermique saisit les empreintes digitales" Electronique, Juin 1998 p75-85
2. J.F. Mainguet: "Une puce pour les empreintes digitales" La Recherche, Septembre 98 (312) p.46& "Un chip para las huellas dactilares" Mundo Scientifico, November 98 (195) p.44
3. J.F. Mainguet: "Authentifier le vivant" Face Au Risque, Novembre 98
4. J.F. Mainguet, M. Pegulu, and J. B. Harris. "Fingerchip: thermal imaging and finger sweeping in a silicon fingerprint sensor. " In Proc. of AutoID 99 , pages 91?4, October 99.
5. J.F. Mainguet, M. Pegulu and J.B. Harris, " Fingerprint recognition based on silicon chips" Future Generation of Computer Systems 16 (2000), Elsevier, pp. 403-415 (submitted March 1999)
6. J.F. Mainguet "Biometrics for Large-scale Consumer Products" International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, June 2003.
7. J.F. Mainguet, Wei Gong, Anne Wang "Reducing Silicon Fingerprint Sensor Area" International Conference on Biometric Authentication ICBA 2004 Hong-Kong July, 15-17 2004 Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 3072 / 2004, pp. 301 - 308 The Wave report

Speaker/cited:

* Identech'98 / Paris / 20 janvier 1998 & 27 mai 1998 "FingerChip, un capteur thermique d'empreintes digitales tout silicium"
* Identech'99 / Paris / 26 janvier 1999 "Technique d'empreintes digitales: les applications du syst?e FingerChip"
* Eurosec'99 / Paris (avec Richard Bault/Cezam) / 23 mars 1999 / Session 7 (programme) "L뭓uthentification par empreinte digitale dans les syst?es d뭝nformation"
* S?inaire Leti-Industrie: Quoi de neuf au sujet des d?ecteurs infrarouges non refroidis? / Ch?eau de Sassenage (France) / 2 avril 1999 "Capteurs d'empreintes digitales par capteurs thermiques"
* Development Institute International / Paris / S?inaire Nouvelles Technologies d'Authentification / 7 mai 1999 "Quel est l'apport des technologies biom?riques dans le contr?e d'acc? physique et logique?"
* Smart Card 2000 / Olympia 2 / London with Richard Bault (Cezam) February 8, 2000 "Fingerprint authentication in IT Systems"
* Development Institute International / Paris / S?inaire Nouvelles Techniques de Signature Electronique & Cryptologie / 20 septembre 2000 "R?ertorier les alternatives offertes par la biom?rie pour s?uriser vos activit? de e-commerce"
* Development Institute International / Paris / S?inaire Mettez ?jour vos techniques de S?urit?Bancaire / 27 septembre 2000 "Tirer profit du d?eloppement de la biom?rie pour am?iorer votre s?urit?bancaire"
* Cartes 2000 / CNIT Paris / October 24, 2000 "Fingerprint recognition based on silicon chips"
Development Institute International / Paris / S?inaire Biom?rie / 5 d?embre 2000 "Comment maximiser la fiabilit?de vos solutions biom?riques et votre s?urit?"
* AI'03 (International Conference on Artificial Intelligence) Las Vegas June 25, 2003 (program) "Biometrics for Large-scale Consumer Products"
* BC'03 (Biometric Consortium Conference) Arlington / September 23, 2003 (program) "Biometrics for Large-scale Consumer Products" (my biography)
* Table ronde INT November 27, 2003 (programme)
* ICBA 2004 / Hong-Kong / July, 15-17 2004 (homepage, program) "Reducing Silicon Fingerprint Sensor Area"
* Fing, r?nion de cl?ure du groupe "Confiance et S?urit? / 28 septembre 2004 / Paris, minist?e de la Recherche Fondation Internet Nouvelle G??ation.
* Development Institute International / Forum 2005 de la S?urit?Bancaire / Paris, le 09 d?embre 2004 "Biom?rie en milieu bancaire"
* Biosec, 2nd workshop / Brussels / January 20, 2005 "Aliveness detection: issues in fingerprint"
* Science&Vie Hors-s?ie novembre 2005 "Les r?olutions de la maison individuelle". Un entrefilet avec l'article sur les serrures.
* Dauphin?Lib??du 2 novembre 2005: "Les puces seront du voyage"
Reed Business Information, Comundi / BIOMETRIE Choisir et mettre en oeuvre votre solution biom?rique / du 14 au 15 D?embre 2005/ Paris (programme)
* Enter 2.0 / agosto 2006 (Colombia) Biometr?, la llave del futuro por Iv? Luzardo. + Identificacion por Biometria, la llave del futuro
* Biometrics 2006 / October, 18-20 / London. "Tutorial: Biometric Sciences - The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly" (Valorie Valencia leading). "Liveness detection". With so many cases now recorded about the 몊poofing?of biometrics, this highly controversial issue will be examined by one of the world뭩 leading authorities.
* The Register: Steal my ID, steal my fingers - the public gets nervous by Mark Ballard (18th October 2006). (archive) Gizmo Watch: Is Biometric Security Safe for the Fingers? Punto Informatico (20 ottobre 2006): La biometria d?la caccia alle password Insic (26 ottobre 2006): La biometria d?la caccia alle password Redazione Antifurto My comment: this is a truncated version of my words. They forgot to say that it's difficult to define what is life, and so saying if a finger is alive or dead is hard because a surgeon can mend a chop finger. It is possible to make things very hard to spoof. But well, this is a much more attractive article as it is :-)
* Speaker at Cardex 2008 in Cairo, 25-MAY-2008.
* Speaker at Digital Identity Assurance 2009 in Dubai, 3-5-MAY-2009

Lessons:

(2007 Oct, 2008 Oct) Biometrics within New trends in cryptology at the Master M2 SCSI, Universit?Joseph Fourier + Polytech / Ensimag, Grenoble.

Professional Associations, thesis:

International Committee on Information Technology Standards (INCITS), voting member M1 Biometrics Committee, M1.3 & M1.5 (up to end 2007)
Groupe de travail Thermique du vivant ( Andr?Dittmar , CNRS / Lyon )
Jury of N.Galy thesis: "Etude d'un syst?e complet de reconnaissance d'empreintes digitales pour un capteur microsyst?e ?balayage"

Award:

"Electron d'or 1998" Electronique / France. ( cover, article )

Patents:

Brevet 96 07419 "Syst?e de lecture d'empreintes digitales" 14 juin 1996
EP0813164 / FR2749955 / JP10091769 / DE69720109 / AT235718 / ZA9705193 / CA2206825 / CN1119766 / CN1172308 / ES2191816 / IL121045
US 6,289,114 "Fingerprint-reading system" September 11, 2001
US 6,459,804 "Fingerprint-reading system" October 1, 2002
Proc??et dispositif de reconnaissance de personne / Person recognition method and device
FR0300593 2003-01-21 / WO2004068394 / EP1586074 / US20060115128 / FR2850190 / KR20050096142
Proc??et dispositif de s?urisation par reconnaissance de personne / Person recognition securement method and device
FR0300594 2003-01-21 / WO2004068388 / EP1586069 / US20090008459 / FR2850191 / CN1739114 / CA2513619
Proc??d'acquisition d'image d'empreinte digitale / Method for the acquisition of an image of a finger print
FR0308822 2003-07-18 / WO2005015481 / EP1646965 / US20060204061 / FR2857768 / CA2532082 / KR20060052839 / CN1826605
G??ateur de s?uences binaires al?toires / Random binary sequence generator
FR0313491 2003-11-18 / WO2005050434 / EP1685479 / FR2862394 / EP1685479 / CN1879079
Capteur d'empreinte digitale ?deux sens de balayage / Two-Way Scanning Fingerprint Sensor
FR0313661 2003-11-21 / WO2005050540 / EP1685520 / FR2862785 / CA2545033 / KR20060108637 / US2008247615 / JP2007511845 / CN100394434
Dispositif de r?ctivation d'un appareil plac?en mode de veille / Activation apparatus
FR0511970 2005-11-25 / WO2007060178 / EP1952615 / FR2894049 / CN101313562
Syst?e de lecture de microreliefs / Optical sensor
FR0513218 2005-12-23 / EP1969524 / WO2007071572
Sensor manufacture with data storage
US7385381 2007-03-06 / WO2008107450
Sensor monitoring / Surveillance de d?ecteur
US2008219520 2007-03-06 / WO2008107449
Incremental recognition
US20080226135 2007-03-12
Biometric control device
US20090058595 2007-08-30
Interleaving slices and anti-spoof data continuously
US20090060296 2007-08-30
Variable resolution biometric sensor
US20090067684 2007-09-06
Biometric data processing
US20090067679 2007-09-11
Fingerprint Sensor with Bump Packaging
US20090067690 2007-09-11 Hardware method to read impedance

US 02-JUN-2008 12/131,625 ==> aux environs de janvier 2010

Software scoring

US 02-JUN-2008 12/136,400

-->
Citations